It was not supposed to be a bigger issue had it been the first offense of such kind by the Caps star and also, had it not happened after a slew of blind-side hits in recent games. We have seen Mat Cooke's failed attempt to rip the head of Marc Savard and not get a suspension. These NHL penalty decisions just draws the line in a blurry manner. Clearly, Mat Cooke has the intention to injure Savard while in contrary Ovechkin's intent was for the play-not the player.
And you have Mat Cooke escaping a suspension? I feel Don Cherry's remarks that other players might consider this as an open season for blind-side hits having seen Cooke get away with it.
No arguement that Ovechkin should get a suspension as it states in the rule:
23.5 Fines and Suspensions - Stick Infractions, Boarding and Checking from Behind Category - In regular League games, any player or goalkeeper who incurs a total of two (2) game misconduct penalties for stick-related infractions, Boarding - Rule 42, or Checking from Behind - Rule 44, shall be suspended automatically for the next League game of his team. For each subsequent game misconduct penalty, the automatic suspension shall be increased by one game.
Except, you can argue whether Ovechkin did it to injure the other player but that's not what the issue in the NHL is. Clearly, the issue is the unbalanced implementation of the rules' penalties. It almost make it look subjective despite consulting a concrete rule book. Simply, if Ovechkin got that kind of penalty, then the likes of Mat Cooke should get more.
Here, Don Cherry offers his thoughts as we are left to watch horrendous montage of Cooke's murder attempts.